MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740418798

Results for the n-queens problem on the Möbius board.

2008· article· en· W2740418798 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan R. Bell, Brett Stevens

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralas. J Comb. · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpossibilityCombinatoricsExtension (predicate logic)MathematicsMöbius stripSet (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsComputer scienceGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider the extension of the n-queens problem to the Mobius strip; that is, the problem of placing a maximum number of nonattacking queens on the m×n chessboard for which the left and right edges are twisted connected. We prove the existence of solutions for the m× n Mobius board for classes of m and n with density 25/48 in the set of all m × n Mobius boards, and show the impossibility of solutions for a set of m and n with density 1/16. We also have computed the total number of solutions for the m×m Mobius board for m from 1 to 16.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.007
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralas. J Comb.Same topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207