MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740522631 · doi:10.1109/icc.2017.7997298

Joint backhaul and access optimization for service-segment-based VN admission control

2017· article· en· W2740522631 on OpenAlexaff
Meisam Mirahsan, Hamid Farmanbar, Halim Yanıkömeroğlu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)Carleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBackhaul (telecommunications)Computer networkAdmission controlTree traversalVirtual networkService (business)Service providerLeverage (statistics)Quality of serviceBase stationAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the problem of admission control of wireless virtual network (VN) service requests in a multi-service network with service-specific service function chains (SFC). SFC imposes traversal constraints on flows, i.e., each flow must visit certain service-specific nodes in a specific order. We leverage the fact that all flows within a service have common traversal constraints and propose a “service-based” admission control approach. For both of the service-based and flow-based approaches, we propose novel joint optimizations of backhaul and access networks for the admission control of VN service requests. We show that our optimization formulation is convex, hence computationally efficient and tractable. We also show that the proposed method is applicable to general backhaul and access networks. The simulation results show that the service-based approach incurs no loss in optimality while greatly reducing problem complexity compared to the flow-based counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207