MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740538705 · doi:10.1109/itec.2017.7993325

Whole-Day Driving Prediction control strategy To minimize PHEV cost

2017· article· en· W2740538705 on OpenAlexaff
Petru Palcu, Jennifer Bauman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringRange (aeronautics)Battery (electricity)Driving rangePlug-inComputer scienceElectric vehicleBattery electric vehicleGenerator (circuit theory)Battery capacityEngineeringPower (physics)Aerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric vehicles must reduce in cost and pose minimal range concerns in order to become viable options for the masses. This paper proposes the Whole-Day Driving Prediction concept which aims to meet these objectives: a plug-in hybrid vehicle uses a very small engine that is turned on at the start of a day's driving if the total driving for the day is expected to exceed the electric range. With this strategy, the engine and generator can be very small (around 5kW) yet extend the electric range greatly, allowing the battery size to be nearly halved. This paper presents simulation results and analysis of the proposed concept.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.389
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207