Stratégie du plan de développement durable du Québec. (Mémoire déposé dans le cadre de la consultation publique sur le plan de développement durable du Québec). (2005).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce document produit par Environnement Jeunesse, en collaboration avec le gouvernement du Quebec, vise a entreprendre des actions qui soient en lien et en collaboration avec l’environnement et le developpement durable. Il donne premierement une definition et fait une reflexion sur le developpement durable, pour ensuite le mettre en lien avec l’education, l’etat actuel de la situation et des connaissances, l’economie, la creation d’un Fond vert. Par la suite, les cinq conditions pour mener a l’atteinte des objectifs sont mentionnees, ainsi que les themes d’actions prioritaires, soient les perturbations climatiques (dont le fait d’encourager le transport en commun, le transport actif, les energies renouvelables), la toxicite (diminuer les substances toxiques, les pesticides), le cycle de vie de nos produits (analyse de sa conception jusqu’a sa disposition), la foresterie, l’eau, les matieres residuelles (gestion ecologique des dechets, recyclage), et le niveau social (engagement du gouvernement).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".