MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740592910 · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00641

Photoinduced Hydrogen Fuel Production and Water Decontamination Technologies. Orthogonal Strategies with a Parallel Future?

2017· article· en· W2740592910 on OpenAlex
Anabel E. Lanterna, J. C. Scaiano

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Energy Letters · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsHuman decontaminationHydrogen productionProduction (economics)Waste managementEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringHydrogenMaterials scienceChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVViewpointNEXTPhotoinduced Hydrogen Fuel Production and Water Decontamination Technologies. Orthogonal Strategies with a Parallel Future?Anabel E. Lanterna and Juan C. Scaiano*View Author Information Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences and Centre for Advanced Materials Research (CAMaR), University of Ottawa, 10 Marie Curie, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 8, 1909–1910Publication Date (Web):August 2, 2017Publication History Received21 July 2017Accepted26 July 2017Published online2 August 2017Published inissue 11 August 2017https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00641https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00641article-commentaryACS PublicationsCopyright © 2017 American Chemical Society. This publication is available under these Terms of Use. Request reuse permissions This publication is free to access through this site. Learn MoreArticle Views1359Altmetric-Citations7LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail PDF (455 KB) Get e-AlertscloseSUBJECTS:Catalysis,Fossil fuels,Hydrogen,Remediation,Water pollution Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.838

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it