MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2740745639 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-1044

Abstract 1044: Development of a miRNA-based signature to predict human cancer metastasis

2017· article· en· W2740745639 on OpenAlexaff
Lian Willetts, Konstantin Stoletov, Juan Jovel, Emma Woolner, John D. Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntravasationHT1080MetastasismicroRNACancerCancer researchBiologyCancer cellMicroarray analysis techniquesCell migrationCellGene expressionGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Metastasis is the primary cause of death for cancer patients, and invasive cancer cell migration is required at multiple steps during metastasis (e.g. intravasation and extravasation). Since microRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated as key regulators of metastatic spread of cancer cells, we sought to develop a miRNA signature that can be used to predict cancer metastasis. We hypothesized that the miRNAs that are functionally required for invasive cell migration could serve as biomarkers to predict human cancer metastasis. We developed an intravital imaging-based approach combined with NGS to screen for miRNAs that are required for invasive cell migration of human HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells. The screen-identified miRNAs were validated in a panel of in vitro and in vivo assays for invasive migration. Microarray analysis identified genes downregulated in transfected HT1080 cells. Publically available databases were used to correlate the expression of screen-identified miRNAs and the progression of multiple human cancers. We used a qRT-PCR approach combined with machine learning to develop a miRNA signature to predict metastasis in a 66-patient cohort of prostate cancer. We identified over twenty novel miRNAs that regulate directional cancer invasion. Microarray analysis in HT1080 cells revealed that the altered expression of metastasis-regulating miRNAs is associated with 50% reduction in gene expression of migration and adhesion gene network components such as integrin a4, CDC42, and transgelin). We evaluated the potential of screen-identified miRNAs to serve as biomarkers to predict cancer metastasis. Using publically available databases, we found that majority of screen-identified miRNAs are dysregulated in multiple human cancer types (e.g. prostate, breast, ovarian and lung) and the expression of these miRNAs correlate directly with patient disease progression. We analyzed the expression of the top two screen-identified miRNAs in plasma samples from the PCa patient cohort. A signature was generated using a weighted K-nearest neighbor algorithm that provided a ROC area under the curve of 0.79 for predicting metastatic disease. We identified a panel of novel metastasis-regulating miRNAs that is functionally involved in human cancer metastasis. These miRNAs have the potential to serve as both biomarkers to predict metastasis and potentially as therapeutic targets to block metastasis. Citation Format: Lian Willetts, Konstantin Stoletov, Juan Jovel, Emma Woolner, John D. Lewis. Development of a miRNA-based signature to predict human cancer metastasis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1044. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1044

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMicroRNA in disease regulation→French-language works237,207→