MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740761987

SUMBER DAYA LAUT INDONESIA DALAM KANCAH MASYARAKAT EKONOMI ASEAN, ANTARA JEBAKAN REIFIKASI DAN DEEP ECOLOGY

2014· article· en· W2740761987 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Muhammad Rustamaji, Bambang Santoso

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyGeographyPolitical scienceBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sea area of Indonesia reached 5.8 million km2, with a cluster of more than 17,500 islands, promising a great resource in facing the ASEAN single market. A coastline of 81,000 km which is actually the second longest in the world after Canada, potentially, become a storefront variety of national products which are marketed around the world. But the single market proposed in Asean Economic Community (AEC), leaving homework, which is not simple in the ecological sector. The purpose of this writing is actually wanting to show challenges that must be faced when AEC creating a single ASEAN market. Based on the categorization of legal study analysis method, the method in use, including method of dogmatic research which developed legal studies as a dogmatic law (Rechtsdogmatiek). The results showed that, consciously or not, the Asean single market has brought a new myth called rationality efficiency of the commodity. Horkheimer and Adorno in their enlightment dialectic explained that in the field of economy, efficiency is the law of the market, substitutes all kinds of feudal and religious restrictions. Then rationality equated with efficiency. When this efficiency is applied in the dynamics of the capitalist economy, what happens next is the entire field of human life will become a commodity. Then came the so-called reification, that is when everything becomes a<br />commodity, people no longer feel enjoy but only for the sake of consumption without establishing social relations in the true sense. At this situation, the ecological damage becomes inevitable, even considered<br />reasonable as a price worth paying. Law, which in essence is the ethical conversation humans to produce justice, easily forgotten because of greed. In-depth perspective on the ecological (deep ecology), which essentially is in the interests of civilization, began excluded. But all such reification excesses can be avoided when the law still pursued progressively, so the law must arrive at the radicality demolition on law assumptions. The law is not only to check the fairness, but it should produce justice, even a new kind of justice, namely justice for the sake of future generations (intergeneration justice). It can be concluded that the ocean should not only being taken for its wealth resources in the trap of reification of the ASEAN single market, but also should be maintained, its preservation for the sake of our next generation in regard of deep ecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.284
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.529
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicLegal Studies and PoliciesFrench-language works237,207