MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2740764258 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4775

Abstract 4775: PTHrP regulate CSC and promote EMT in the PyMT model of breast cancer progression

2017· article· en· W2740764258 on OpenAlexaff
Rui Zhang, Jiarong Li, Andrew C. Karaplis, Richard Kremer

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProgenitor cellCancer stem cellCancer researchPopulationCirculating tumor cellCancer cellTumor progressionChemistryEpithelial cell adhesion moleculeCancerBiologyStem cellInternal medicineMetastasisCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract PTH-related peptide (PTHrP) was first discovered in cancer patients as the primary cause of humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy (HHM). We previously showed that PTHrP ablation in the MMTV-PyMT murine model of breast cancer progression can dramatically prolongs tumor latency, slows tumor growth & metastases suggesting that PTHrP may regulate cancer stem cells (CSCs). CSCs & epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) have been recognized as driving forces in tumor initiation & progression, & have been characterized previously using ALDH & CD49/EpCAM markers. Here, we aim to determine the role of PTHrP in CSCs & EMT regulation. For this purpose, we analyzed tumor cells derived from Pthrpflox/flox;Cre- (Control) & Pthrpflox/flox;Cre+ (KO) tumors. Cells were incubated with ALDH reagent followed by CD49f/EpCAM antibody labelling & subjected to FACS analysis. Using CD49f/EpCAM labelling, cells separated into two distinct populations, luminal progenitor cells (CD49f+EpCAM+) & EMT cells (CD49f+EpCAM-). In control tumors, ~85% of cells were characterized as luminal progenitor and ~15% as EMT. In contrast, in KO tumors, ~97% of cells were characterized as luminal progenitor whereas only ~2% were EMT. Using ALDH staining alone, ~8% & ~10% of the cells from the control & KO tumor were ALDH+, respectively. Furthermore, the majority of the ALDH+ cells were predominately contained within the luminal progenitor population in both the control & KO tumors cells. Next, we confirmed the dividing capacity of the two cell populations using a lipophilic fluorescent dye, PKH26. As expected, luminal progenitor cells exhibited a fast-dividing phenotype, whereas EMT cells displayed a slow dividing phenotype. However, using mammosphere assay, we did not see any significant difference in mammosphere forming efficiency between control & KO tumor. In summary, PTHrP ablation significantly diminishes the EMT population in KO compared to the control tumor. In conclusion, PTHrP may shift the tumor cell phenotype towards EMT, which suggests a mechanism underlying PTHrP - driven metastases. Citation Format: Rui Zhang, Jiarong Li, Andrew C. Karaplis, Richard Kremer. PTHrP regulate CSC and promote EMT in the PyMT model of breast cancer progression [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4775. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4775

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.521
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBone health and treatments→French-language works237,207→