Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research theoretically describes the molecule n2 p2 with cemetery group d-h using ab initio /STO-3 G that is included in the package of HyperChem Pro.6.0. this study also discusses the effect of atom toward electronic features and the structure that is formed from molecule n2 p2. Moreover, this research investigated the effect of cemetery group n1-P2 toward molecule stability n2 P2. Research findings revealed that loop n1-P2 or loop P2-P3 could be single loop, double loop, and even triple loop. For the optimum result, the most stable molecule was CIP (E=993242,9375), that is the optimum result of CIPPCI. However, the most unstable molecule was PP (E=423494,6563), that is the optimum result of HPPH. In one group from top-down or in a period form left-right, total energy seems decrease. In other words, n2 P2 was seen more stable.\n\n \nKey wordS :Ab initio, molekul n2P2, grup simetri D~h
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".