MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741075329 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2733580

Locally Weighted Ridge Regression for Power System Online Sensitivity Identification Considering Data Collinearity

2017· article· en· W2741075329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesSouth China University of TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsCollinearityTikhonov regularizationSensitivity (control systems)RegressionComputer scienceMathematical optimizationRegression analysisElectric power systemIdentification (biology)Linear regressionNonlinear systemMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Power (physics)StatisticsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceInverse problemElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power system operations data are sometimes limited in a given space due to system collinearity. As such, the operations data recorded around an operating point of concern may be deficient or isotropically dispersed. Consequently, online sensitivity identification using ordinary regression methods is prone to large errors. In this paper, a locally weighted ridge regression method is proposed to overcome this problem. The norm-2 Tikhonov-Phillips regularization is integrated into the locally weighted linear regression. The integrated algorithm then has the ability to keep the online sensitivity identification stable if data are collinear while also accommodating the nonlinear and time-varying properties of the sensitivities. The mathematical derivation, online tuning, implementation, and practical considerations of the proposed method are presented. Its effectiveness is validated in a simulation system with operations data measured from real power systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it