MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741203640 · doi:10.1109/icc.2017.7996993

Wireless noise prevention for mobile agents in smart home

2017· article· en· W2741203640 on OpenAlexaff
Petros Spachos, Liang Song, Konstantinos N. Plataniotis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless sensor networkComputer scienceWirelessHome automationComputer networkWi-Fi arrayKey distribution in wireless sensor networksNoise (video)Wireless networkInterference (communication)Fixed wirelessReal-time computingEmbedded systemTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a smart home, the home status, as well as the human activities, can be observed through a number of sensors. A wireless network can transfer the data to an information system and the commands from the information system to the sensors and actuators. In small areas such as smart homes, four types of noise may form in communication system. In this work, we explore how the noise can be resolved by integrating the Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) management with the smart home information system. The result is to smoothen the wireless communication. Additionally, the sensors and actuators are applied efficiently, since the information system places them automatically in the right place at right time. The proposed Opportunistic Mesh (OPM) wireless method avoids signal interference/ collision in small rooms, in order to minimize interference with home regular wireless services, such as WiFi. A model to vector the mobile agent in the smart home is proposed and a mobile agent is used to automatically approach the target positions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score0.353

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207