More traumatic and humiliating than assault itself”: Exploring students’ perceptions of Dalhousie University’s management of sexual assault issues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sexual assault on university campuses remains a pervasive issue, with Dalhousie University being no exception.It has been argued that universities regularly fail their victims of sexual assault as they do not adequately manage sexualassault issues on their campuses. Few studies, however, identify the perceptions of students on these university campuses.A qualitative methodology of nine semi-structured interviews was employed to explore the perceptions of Dalhousieundergraduate students regarding Dalhousie’s management of sexual assault issues. This study shows that DalhousieUniversity, in the eyes of its students, does not adequately manage sexual assault issues on campus. Students speak to thepersisting rape culture on campus, the lack of resources on campus and the multiple barriers to these resources that exist.This research sheds light on the consistent rates of poor management of sexual assault issues on university campusesnationwide, from the perspective of the students, some of whom are victims of these sexual assaults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".