Global-residual and Local-boundary Refinement Networks for Rectifying Scene Parsing Predictions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of existing scene parsing methods suffer from the serious problems of both inconsistent parsing results and object boundary shift. To tackle these problems, we first propose an iterative Global-residual Refinement Network (GRN) through exploiting global contextual information to predict the parsing residuals and iteratively smoothen the inconsistent parsing labels. Furthermore, we propose a Local-boundary Refinement Network (LRN) to learn the position-adaptive propagation coefficients so that local contextual information from neighbors can be optimally captured for refining object boundaries. Finally, we cascade the proposed two refinement networks after a fully residual convolutional neural network within a uniform framework. Extensive experiments on ADE20K and Cityscapes datasets well demonstrate the effectiveness of the two refinement methods for refining scene parsing predictions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it