Multi-instance multi-label active learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-instance multi-label learning(MIML) has been successfully applied into many real-world applications. Along with the enhancing of the expressive power, the cost of labelling a MIML example increases significantly. And thus it becomes an important task to train an effective MIML model with as few labelled examples as possible. Active learning, which actively selects the most valuable data to query their labels, is a main approach to reducing labeling cost. Existing active methods achieved great success in traditional learning tasks, but cannot be directly applied to MIML problems. In this paper, we propose a MIML active learning algorithm, which exploits diversity and uncertainty in both the input and output space to query the most valuable information. This algorithm designs a novel query strategy for MIML objects specifically and acquires more precise information from the oracle without addition cost. Based on the queried information, the MIML model is then effectively trained by simultaneously optimizing the relative rank among instances and labels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it