Les terres promises : rôle social et filiation chez les Algonquins âgés de Kitigan Zibi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’auteure étudie la solitude et l’isolement d’Algonquins âgés de la bande de Kitigan Zibi à partir de la perception du rôle social des aînés qui se dégage de leurs représentations de l’acquisition et de la transmission des valeurs matérielles et culturelles. Ces représentations révèlent des signifiants tels que la terre, le travail des aînés et l’importance du rôle social des personnes âgées dans la communauté actuelle. L’auteure constate que la terre est un élément fondamental de l’identité individuelle et collective, qui traverse toutes les représentations de l’héritage matériel et de l’héritage culturel. Le travail des aînés, qui leur servait de modèle identificatoire dans leur lignée et dans leur communauté, a perdu son sens traditionnel. Tout en restant le moyen d’affirmation de certaines personnes âgées particulièrement impliquées dans la vie communautaire, le rôle social des Algonquins âgés s’est transformé et n’est plus l’élément déterminant du lien social qui fonde la vie communautaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".