MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741383248

Optimal Horizontal Well Placement: Formation Boundary Mapping While Drilling

2013· article· en· W2741383248 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Daniel Bourgeois, Ryan Bielefeld, Schlumberger Drilling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingGeologyDirectional drillingPetroleum engineeringMeasurement while drillingLogging while drillingDrillHorizontal and verticalMining engineeringEngineeringGeodesyMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary In Western Canada several oil and gas producers are seeing the benefit of developing their field by drilling horizontal production wells. The success of horizontal wells depends on the ability to stay in the target formation while drilling the lateral section. In the past the data that could be collected while drilling has been limited. Cuttings analysis and logging while drilling (LWD) allowed operators to identify when the well bore leaves the zone of interest. However, because traditional LWD measurement have had a shallow depth of investigation geosteering horizontal wells has been reactive. Typically the well has to drill out of the zone of interest before a problem is identified. New technology indroduced by Schlumberger in 2003 takes a proactive rather then a reactive approach to geosteering horizontal wells. Deep reading and directional sensitive resistivity measurements allow formation resistivity contacts to be mapped in real time. These measurements have a depth of investigation of up to 5 meters. With the ability to see formation contacts from this distance well bores can be placed relative to the formation contacts, reducing the risk of exiting the reservoir and allowing for more productive horizontal wells. This technology was first brought to Western Canada in 2006 and had a significant impact on how horizontal wells were placed in different environments in 2007. Theory and/or Method In order to be successful while drilling horizontal wells a method is need to keep the lateral section in the reservoir. This is not easy in complex geology where sub-seismic features will make it difficult to know where exactely to place the well. The ability to map formation contacts in real time, without exiting the reservoir reduce this sub-seismic uncertainity. Using Directional-Deep Resistivity Logging While Drilling (DDR-LWD) allow for this real time boundary mapping and enables operators to drill better horizontal wells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.123
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207