MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741393929

Morphoanatomical characterization of fruit, seed and seedling of Desmodium incanum DC. (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Desmodieae) Caracterización morfoanatómica de fruto, semilla y plántula de Desmodium incanum DC. (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Desmodieae)

2013· article· es· W2741393929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melina Scandaliaris, María Laura Molinelli, Rita J. Lovey, Patricia Perissé, Virginia M. Pérez, Claudia Arias

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTrichomeFabaceaeSeedlingDesmodiumBotanyGenusGerminationEpicotylEndospermLeucaena leucocephalaSmothering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desmodium incanum DC. is a herbaceous legume distributed from Canada to Central Argentina and Uruguay. It is a high quality forage and palatable for animals, its leaves are used in folk medicine and it is considered a weed of hard control. The objectives were to characterize the exomorphology and the anatomy of fruits, seeds and seedlings of D. incanum. The plant material was collected in Montecristo and Cerro Pelado (Cordoba-Argentina). The morphoanatomical analysis were performed on fruits, seeds and seedlings, including histochemical tests. The results show: loment indehiscent fruit, with phenolic compounds and crystals; reniform seed with fleshy aryl and epihilum, embryo axial type, subtype curved; typical anatomy Faboideae seed with piriform tracheid bar; phaneroepigeal seedling germination of Macaranga and Sophora morphological types, photosynthetic cotyledonary leaves, opposite protophyll, the first nomophylls are simple, crystals in epidermis and in the parenchyma of the epicotyl. We present the particularities of eglandular and glandular trichomes and their distribution pattern in the studied organs. The results are compared with those cited for other species of the genus, from other tribes or family in general. Original data were accompanied by photographs that will allow to recognize this species in the studied stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207