MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741393929

Morphoanatomical characterization of fruit, seed and seedling of Desmodium incanum DC. (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Desmodieae) Caracterización morfoanatómica de fruto, semilla y plántula de Desmodium incanum DC. (Fabaceae: Faboideae: Desmodieae)

2013· article· es· W2741393929 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Melina Scandaliaris, María Laura Molinelli, Rita J. Lovey, Patricia Perissé, Virginia M. Pérez, Claudia Arias

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotanical Research and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTrichomeFabaceaeSeedlingDesmodiumBotanyGenusGerminationEpicotylEndospermLeucaena leucocephalaSmothering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desmodium incanum DC. is a herbaceous legume distributed from Canada to Central Argentina and Uruguay. It is a high quality forage and palatable for animals, its leaves are used in folk medicine and it is considered a weed of hard control. The objectives were to characterize the exomorphology and the anatomy of fruits, seeds and seedlings of D. incanum. The plant material was collected in Montecristo and Cerro Pelado (Cordoba-Argentina). The morphoanatomical analysis were performed on fruits, seeds and seedlings, including histochemical tests. The results show: loment indehiscent fruit, with phenolic compounds and crystals; reniform seed with fleshy aryl and epihilum, embryo axial type, subtype curved; typical anatomy Faboideae seed with piriform tracheid bar; phaneroepigeal seedling germination of Macaranga and Sophora morphological types, photosynthetic cotyledonary leaves, opposite protophyll, the first nomophylls are simple, crystals in epidermis and in the parenchyma of the epicotyl. We present the particularities of eglandular and glandular trichomes and their distribution pattern in the studied organs. The results are compared with those cited for other species of the genus, from other tribes or family in general. Original data were accompanied by photographs that will allow to recognize this species in the studied stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBotanical Research and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207