MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741420915 · doi:10.1109/asap.2017.7995283

A fast and accurate logarithm accelerator for scientific applications

2017· article· en· W2741420915 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Chen, Xue Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLookup tableThrashingParallel computingLogarithmBottleneckPolynomialInterpolation (computer graphics)Elementary functionCacheTable (database)Single-precision floating-point formatArithmeticComputational scienceAlgorithmEmbedded systemMathematicsProgramming languageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many scientific applications rely on evaluation of elementary functions. Nowadays, high-level programming languages provide their own elementary function libraries in software by using lookup table and/or polynomial approximation. However, one downside is slow since lookup tables could keep cache thrashing and polynomial approximations require a number of iterations to converge. Thus, elementary functions evaluation becomes bottleneck for most scientific applications. With this motivation, we propose a generalized pipelined hardware architecture for elementary functions to accelerate scientific applications. This paper presents a pipelined, single precision logarithm hardware accelerator (SP-LHA). Throughput of SP-LHA is at least 2.5GFLOPS in 65nm ASICs, while the circuit consists of ≈60,000 logic gates. Average accuracy of SP-LHA is 22.5 out of 23 bits, which is achieved by using 7.8KB lookup table and parabolic interpolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207