Entre présentation et représentation : le corps à travers l’oeil de la caméra de Carolee Schneemann
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dès le début des années 1960, la peintre américaine Carolee Schneemann s’empare de la caméra pour filmer ses performances. Ainsi l’artiste ajoute l’outil filmique à ses autres pratiques artistiques, la peinture et la performance. Revendiquant des préoccupations politico-sociales telles que le féminisme ou l’anti-militarisme, Schneemann utilise la caméra à la fois dans une volonté de décloisonner les genres artistiques, d’affirmer une identité créatrice et féminine et de repousser les limites de la présentation et de la représentation de son propre corps à travers une affirmation de son image et de sa sexualité. Comment le film va-t-il participer à la reconstruction de l’image d’un corps artistique féminin et permettre à Schneemann de se saisir de son pouvoir de création? Cet article tente de répondre à ces questions par une recontextualisation de ses films Meat Joy (1964) et Fuses (1964-1967).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".