MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741584520 · doi:10.1145/3129173.3129176

2017 Kleene award

2017· article· en· W2741584520 on OpenAlexaff
Prakash Panangaden

Bibliographic record

VenueACM SIGLOG News · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConstructivePresentation (obstetrics)Completeness (order theory)Computer scienceKleene's recursion theoremKleene algebraCalculus (dental)MathematicsProgramming languageDiscrete mathematicsAlgorithmMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The LICS conference presents the Kleene Award annually to the best student paper or papers accepted for presentation at LICS that year. This year there were five eligible student papers accepted to LICS 2017. The program committee selected Amina Doumane for the 2017 Kleene Award for her paper "Constructive completeness for the linear-time mu-calculus".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0150.010
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3040.275

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM SIGLOG NewsSame topicNumerical Methods and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207