Postinfarction left ventricular free wall rupture: a 17-year single-centre experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) is a catastrophic complication following acute myocardial infarction with an estimated incidence of 0.2-7.6% and mortality can be as high as 60%. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for morbidity and mortality in patients affected by LVFWR. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 35 patients who underwent surgery for LVFWR between January 2000 and December 2016 at our institution. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 68.3 years. The in-hospital survival was 65.7% (n = 23), and 13% of survived patients presented with cardiac arrest. The following characteristics were associated with in-hospital mortality at univariable analysis: pre-existing hypertension (P = 0.02), need for inotropes (P = 0.02) and cardiac arrest (P < 0.0001) at presentation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (P = 0.004), preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P = 0.004), technique of LVFWR repair (P = 0.013), operation on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P = 0.005) and postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P = 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, cardiac arrest at presentation was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 11.7, 95% confidence interval 2.352-59.063; P = 0.003). The overall mean postoperative follow-up was 8.3 ± 1.3 years. Overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 53.2 ± 8.6% and 49.1 ± 8.9%, respectively. Among the survivors, only 6 (26.1%) patients died during follow-up with a 5-year and 10-year overall survival rate of 80.9 ± 8.7% and 74.7 ± 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a trend towards long-term benefit in patients surviving high-risk surgery for LVFWR repair. Considering the high lethality of LVFWR, the urgency and complexity of the primary surgical intervention early diagnosis and prompt surgery play a key role in the management of this complication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".