General inflammation and stress in patients with intestinal protozoan infections in two hospitals in Tehran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Protozoa are unicellular eukaryotes. A type of intestinal protozoan pathogens is the cause of infection and serious injuries in human with or without clinical symptoms. It seems that parasitic infections as a stressor factor can affect on stress system activity and immune system function and sensitivity. The major purpose of this paper was to evaluate serum cortisol level and the general inflammation by measuring neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with intestinal protozoa. Methods: A total of 40 men were entered in a case-control study in Besat and Baqyiatallah (a.s.) Hospitals in Tehran from April to September 2014. Men were equally divided into 2 groups based on infection with the intestinal protozoa (control and patient groups). This study was conducted on blood samples of these people. Serum cortisol level and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio were determined in control and patient with the intestinal protozoa groups. Cortisol was measured using cortisol kit (Diagnostic Biochem, Canada) and by ELISA method. In addition, the samples were treated with Wright stain method, and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was calculated using WBC diffraction method. Results: According to the results of this study, mean age between control and patient groups was not statistically significant (P= 0.91). Serum cortisol concentration in patients with the intestinal protozoa was significantly higher than the control group (P= 0.043). In addition, a significant increase was observed in neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with parasitic infections compared to the control group (P= 0.026). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, parasitic infection (intestinal protozoa) as a stressor factor can increase serum cortisol concentration. In addition, intestinal protozoa was reduced immune system sensitivity and function. It seems that the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio can be a potential useful parameters for evaluating the stress system activity and function in patients infected with the intestinal protozoa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".