MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741785359 · doi:10.4171/cmh/416

An explicit cycle map for the motivic cohomology of real varieties

2017· article· en· W2741785359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommentarii Mathematici Helvetici · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMotivic cohomologyCohomologyAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsEquivariant cohomologyDe Rham cohomology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a direct construction of a cycle map in the level of representing complexes from the motivic cohomology of real (or complex) varieties to the appropriate ordinary cohomology theory. For complex varieties, this is simply integral Betti cohomology, whereas for real varieties the recipient theory is the bigraded \operatorname{Gal}(\mathbb C/\mathbb R) -equivariant cohomology [19]. Using the finite analytic correspondences from [7] we provide a sheaf-theoretic approach to ordinary equivariant RO(G) -graded cohomology for any finite group G . In particular, this gives a complex of sheaves \mathbb Zp_{\omega} on a suitable equivariant site of real analytic manifolds-with-corner whose construction closely parallels that of the Voevodsky's motivic complexes $$\mathbb Zp_{\mathcal M} . Our cycle map is induced by the change of sites functor that assigns to a real variety X its analytic space X(\mathbb C)$ together with the complex conjugation involution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it