MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741934528 · doi:10.48075/igepec.v20i2.15705

Proposta de modelo estrutural para interação universidade-empresa: experiência da Universidade Federal do Tocantins & Empresa Trans Kothe

2016· article· pt· W2741934528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInforme GEPEC · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicBusiness and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsTransport Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Esse artigo apresenta uma nova abordagem conceitual e prática a respeito da interação universidade-empresa, a partir da avaliação do projeto LogFuture, que foi um programa desenvolvido pelo curso de logítica da Universidade Federal do Tocantins - UFT, em parceria com a transportadora Trans Kothe, com o propósito de formar acadêmicos qualificados para atender a demanda da empresa por mão de obra qualificada. Enquanto método de pesquisa foi utilizado o “Estudo de Caso” enquadrado dentro da abordagem qualitativa. Como instrumento de coleta de dados foi utilizada a entrevista semi-estruturada. A pesquisa apresenta toda a modelagem do processo de interação, desde a concepção do método, até a finalização do programa, que resultou na contratação de mais de 70% dos acadêmicos que participaram do projeto. A expectativa é que o modelo inovador de interação seja amplamente difundido na perspectiva de se propagar ainda mais as relações de colaboração entre universidades e empresas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.741
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it