Challenging Canadian Identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We chose the curriculum unit of 1982-Present in the Grade 10 Introduction to Canadian History course because it is often one that we have seen neglected in our experience as students and Teacher Candidates. Since the course spans a long period of time, many teachers do not leave sufficient time or run out of time for this area of the course, meaning that this unit is often absent or rushed. We chose to create resources and lesson plans for this unit so that we could bring attention to many events and issues that would help students understand Canadian History to the present. The central theme of our unit is “Challenging Canadian Identity” because many of the topics explored in the period of 1982 - Present have repercussions that challenge the stereotype or “typical” Canadian identity. We feel that exploring these topics will allow students to develop the skills necessary to look at themselves as Canadians through multiple lenses, therefore also developing their own multi-faceted identities as responsible Canadian citizens. We want the students to understand that there is not one cohesive “Canadian identity” and we want them to have the skills to be able to challenge the generally accepted norms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.095 | 0.028 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.027 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".