MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742178625 · doi:10.17722/ijme.v9i2.346

Green Transformational Leadership and Green Performance: The mediating role of Green Mindfulness and Green Self-efficacy

2017· article· en· W2742178625 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Management Excellence · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEmployee Performance and Leadership
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformational leadershipMindfulnessPsychologyBusinessSocial psychologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To increase the green performance of an organization Green Transformational Leadership is very important. This study mainly focuses the impact on Green Performance of Green Transformational Leadership by considering the mediating effect of Green Self-Efficacy and Green Mindfulness.The study is descriptive and quantitative in nature. Survey questionnaire method was used and data have been collected from 200 respondents by applying simple random sampling technique. After applying required tests on AMOS and SPSS, findings revealed that transformational leadership has asignificant and positive impact on Green performance. Moreover, a result also enlightened that Green Mindfulness and Green Self-efficacy significantly and moderately mediates the relationship between Green Performance and transformational leadership. At the end, this article implementation, suggestion, and limitation have also been included for further researches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.656

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it