MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742234247 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.246

246 Over-feeding metabolizable protein supply in late gestation beef cattle: Effects on colostrum composition, milk and milk component yield, and pre-weaning growth of calves

2017· article· en· W2742234247 on OpenAlexaff
Koryn S Hare, Katharine M Wood, Carolyn Fitzsimmons, G.B. Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColostrumLactoseAnimal scienceIce calvingNEFASomatic cell countLactationWeaningRandomized block designUreaBlood urea nitrogenBiologyFood scienceEndocrinologyPregnancyInsulinCreatinineBiochemistryImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective was to determine the effect of oversupplying metabolizable protein (MP) pre-partum on colostrum composition, milk and component yield, blood metabolites, and pre-weaning growth of calves. Twenty-four primiparous crossbred Hereford cows were assigned to either a high protein (HP; 140% of predicted MP requirement, n = 12) or control (CON; 100% of predicted MP requirement, n = 12) treatment. Cows were individually fed their treatment diet from d -56 until parturition and then were switched to a common diet post-partum. Colostrum samples were collected, via hand stripping, immediately after calving. The 24-h milk yield was estimated by measuring a 2-quarter 12-h milk yield (MY) on d 7, 13, 28, 33, 70, and 112. Milk and colostrum samples were analyzed for fat, CP, lactose, urea-N (MUN), and somatic cell count (SCC). Blood samples were collected from cows via jugular venipuncture on d -35, -17, 7, and 28 and analyzed for plasma glucose and serum NEFA. Calf BW and frame measurements were conducted at birth and on d 7, 28, 57, 82, and 112. Data were analyzed as a completely randomized block design using the MIXED procedure of SAS. Fixed effects included treatment, time, and the two-way interaction, and the random effects were cow and block. Day was analyzed as a repeated measure. Heifers consuming the HP diet pre-partum had less fat in colostrum (3.63 vs. 7.01%; P < 0.01) compared to the CON, but CP, lactose, and MUN were not affected. There was no effect of pre-partum treatment on MY or composition. Day relative to parturition affected MY (kg/d) with a progressive decrease from 6.91 on d 7 to 5.06 kg on d 112 (P < 0.01). Milk fat decreased from d 7 (3.59%) to d 28 (3.43%) and then gradually increased to d 112 (3.85%, P = 0.01). Milk CP (P < 0.01) and MUN (P < 0.01) followed a similar pattern as reported for fat. Lactose concentration increased from d 7 (4.55%) to d 28 (4.80%) and then decreased to d 112 (4.51%, P < 0.01). Plasma glucose and serum NEFA did not differ by treatment or week. There was no effect of pre-partum treatment on calf BW or frame measurements. Oversupplying MP pre-partum may decrease colostrum fat without affecting MY, milk composition, and calf growth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207