Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishThe equality provisions in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect the individual’s rights to belong to three types of communities simultaneously: the universal community of human beings, the Canadian political communities, and individual identity communities. These rights ensure the diversity of our multicultural country. The author examines the historical antecedents of Charter equality provisions and the purposive approach to their interpretation. The author concludes that the Supreme Court of Canada is moving towards a “full membership” model of equality rights which ensures that membership in identity communities cannot be the basis for exclusionary or discriminatory treatment. francaisLes dispositions concernant les droits a l’egalite contenues dans la Charte canadienne des droits et libertes protege les droits des individus a appartenir a trois types de communautes simultanement; la communaute universelle des humains, les communautes politiques canadiennes et les communautes de l’identite individuelle. Ces droits assurent la diversite de notre pays multiculturel. L’auteur examine les antecedents historiques des dispositions relatives aux droits a l’egalite contenus dans la Charte et leur interpretation fondee sur l’objet vise. L’auteur conclut que la Cour supreme du Canada se dirige vers un modele de «membre de plein droit» des droits a l’egalite ce qui garantit que l’appartenance a une communaute d’identite ne peut pas servir de base de traitement exclusif ou discriminatoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.026 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".