L'utilisation de la percussion comme élément structurant dans l'élaboration d'un langage musical
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce mémoire expose le travail effectué durant mes deux années de maîtrise en composition instrumentale à l’Université de Montréal. J’y fais la présentation de cinq pièces ainsi qu’une analyse de chacune d’elles afin de démontrer ma démarche créatrice et mon langage musical. Dans ces cinq pièces, j’ai souhaité approfondir l’écriture pour percussion afin de lui donner une place privilégiée à travers divers ensembles, passant de pièces vocales à une pièce pour quatuor de percussions, jusqu’à des pièces orchestrales. Par l’entremise de la percussion, j’ai mis de l’avant l’aspect rythmique de la musique avec l’utilisation de procédés rythmiques variés comme de la polyrythmie, de l’homorythmie, des changements de métrique, des jeux de pulsation, de la périodicité, etc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".