MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742434859 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.012

012 Meloxicam and temperament effects on growth performance and indicators of pain in knife or band castrated calves housed on pasture

2017· article· en· W2742434859 on OpenAlexaff
Désirée Gellatly, Sònia Martí, Daniela M Meléndez, D. Moya, E. D. Janzen, Edmond A. Pajor, K. S. Schwartzkopf-Genswein

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCastrationMeloxicamAnimal scienceTemperamentLamenessMedicineSubcutaneous injectionInternal medicineBiologySurgeryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of castration method, meloxicam, and temperament on growth performance and indicators of pain in band- or knife-castrated beef calves. Seventy-two crossbred Angus calves (76 ± 2 d of age and 134.5 ± 20.30 kg BW) were randomly assigned to treatments according to a 3 × 2 factorial design assessing castration technique (CAST; knife [K], band [B], or sham castration [S]) and drug administration (DRUG; single subcutaneous injection of meloxicam at the time of castration [0.5 mg Metacam/kg BW] or single subcutaneous injection of saline solution as control). Calves were managed in 2 groups (GROUP) of 36 to be castrated on 2 separate days, 2 wk apart. Calves were housed on pasture with ad libitum access to water. Temperament was assessed by measuring flight speed (FS; m/s); faster animals indicated more excitable temperament. Growth performance was assessed using ADG (kg/d). Substance P (SP; pg/mL) and stride length (SL; cm) were used as physiological and behavioral indicators of pain, respectively; greater SP and SL values indicated greater and lower pain levels, respectively. Initial BW and FS were collected on d −6, −1 (prior to castration day), and 0 (immediately prior to castration) as baseline measurements and on d 6, 13, 20, 34, 48, and 62 after castration (DAY). Calves were blocked by the average FS and BW obtained on d −6 and −1. Data was analyzed using a mixed-effects model including CAST, DRUG, DAY, and their interactions as fixed effects and GROUP as a random effect. The average baseline measurements of BW, the average of all FS measurements, and the average of SP or SL obtained on d −1 and 0 were used as covariates. Growth performance was greater (P < 0.05) in S (1.33 ± 0.03 kg/d) than in K and B (1.21 ± 0.03 and 1.22 ± 0.03 kg/d, respectively). For every 1 m/s increment in FS, SP decreased by 8.7 pg/mL (P < 0.05). There was no effect of CAST, DRUG, or FS on SL. As expected, both knife- and band-castrated calves had reduced ADG compared with S calves. Faster FS was associated with lower pain levels, indicating that temperament can affect physiological measures. A single subcutaneous injection of meloxicam had no effect on growth performance or the indicators of pain used in this study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207