MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742527331 · doi:10.1680/jwama.16.00118

Evaluating the longer term benefits of sustainable drainage

2017· article· en· W2742527331 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Ashley, Christopher Digman, B. Horton, Berry Gersonius, Brian J. Smith, Paul Shaffer, A. Baylis

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water Management · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsRisk analysis (engineering)Value of informationDrainageTerm (time)Value (mathematics)Flood mythEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementBusinessComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental scienceEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) can bring a wide range of benefits in addition to reductions in flood risk. However, there is limited quantified evidence of the value of these benefits. To help address this, the Construction Industry Research and Information Association led a project to develop the Benefits of SuDS Tool (Best). The approach presented in this paper shows how scenario planning can be used in Best to evaluate longer term benefits in the face of future uncertainty. Three case studies are presented, showing how this can inform robust decisions and the selection of SuDS options for maximum value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score0.430

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Water ManagementSame topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207