A Weighted Combining Algorithm for Spatial Multiplexing MIMO DF Relaying Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jointly detecting the signals from the source and relay in a spatial multiplexing (SM) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) relaying system improves the transmit reliability significantly. However, the existing joint detection schemes for SM MIMO relaying systems, which achieve full diversity, such as the near maximum likelihood (ML) decoder, suffer from high complexity. In this paper, we propose a weighted combining (WC) algorithm, which is applied before the detector in the SM MIMO decode-and-forward relaying system. The proposed algorithm merges the received signal vectors from the source and relay into a combined signal without expanding their dimension, and formulates an equivalent MIMO channel matrix for the combined signal, resulting in a lower complexity for the subsequent detection. We analyze the performance of the proposed WC algorithm with ML detection in terms of the diversity order and computational complexity. An approximate upper bound on the symbol error probability (SEP) for the proposed algorithm is also derived. Simulation results show that in symmetric networks, the proposed WC algorithm achieves substantially lower complexity, while maintaining an SEP performance similar to that of the benchmark NML decoder. The consistency of the derived upper bound on the SEP is also verified by simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".