Tip of an iceberg: complications of an oesophageal foreign body removal in a dog
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A female golden retriever dog was presented for the removal of an oesophageal foreign body. Clinical examination on admission revealed a mild hypovolemia associated with tachypnoea. Radiographic examination of the chest did not reveal any other condition apart from the presence of two oesophageal foreign bodies. The animal was anaesthetised to attempt an endoscopic removal, and after induction of anaesthesia a severe desaturation and difficulties providing manual ventilation were noted. These signs persisted during the entire procedure, and after recovery from anaesthesia a severe aspiration pneumonia was diagnosed. The animal’s condition worsened quickly and required the use of long‐term mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. After 3 days of hospitalisation, the animal was euthanased due to the development of an acute respiratory distress syndrome and the lack of clinical improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it