MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742638616 · doi:10.13130/2039-9251/8736

Le recours à l’amorce spectaculaire dans le processus de resensibilisation du spectateur : ouvertures vers le sacré

2017· article· en· W2742638616 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hervé Guay, Sara Thibault

Bibliographic record

VenueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMilitary, Security, and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)LiminalityHumanitiesArtFeelingAestheticsPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although it plunges the viewer into a more or less familiar world, contemporary theatre at times employs a dramatic primer that, by just preceding the performance itself, plays a crucial role in the process of resensitization of the audience that is present at such an event. This process can be theorized through the notion of the experience where the theatrical event is transformed, and through the liminal quality of the introduction that precedes it. With the help of two remarkable Québécois theatre performances – Les Troyennes d'Euripide and Ascension d’Olivier Choinière – this article will investigate how the dramatic primer allows for the activation of the viewer's senses by reconnecting them with a moving, touching, dynamic, feeling body, in order to broaden his openness beyond the everyday reality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0090.019
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRiviste UNIMI (Università degli studi di Milano)Same topicMilitary, Security, and Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207