MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742762985 · doi:10.4000/books.pup.6829

Les monstres chez Ambroise Paré : un regard rétrospectif

2005· book-chapter· fr· W2742762985 on OpenAlexaff
Y Baille

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1598, paraît chez la veuve Buon, à Paris, la cinquième édition des Œuvres d’Ambroise Paré, Conseiller et Premier Chirurgien du Roy, divisées en vingt neuf livres avec les figures et portraits, tant de l’Anatomie que des instruments de Chirurgie et de plusieurs Monstres. Il est précisé que l’œuvre a été revue et augmentée par l’auteur peu avant son décès.La publication de son œuvre, en un seul volume, a été source d’une grande fierté pour Ambroise Paré qui écrit dans sa dédicace au Très Ch...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooksSame topicHistorical and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207