MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742825853 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.696

696 Whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism study of Romanov sheep

2017· article· en· W2742825853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Т. Е. Денискова, А. В. Доцев, Marina Selionova, Klaus Wimmers, Henry Reyer, В. Р. Харзинова, Г. Брем, N. A. Zinovieva

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreedCrossbreedBiologyGenetic diversitySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsDemographyGenotypePopulationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Romanov breed stands out from the global variety of sheep breeds. Romanovs originated from local sheep at the end of 17th century in the Volga Valley. Since the 1970s, the breed has become popular in France, Canada, and the United States. Some unique traits are of permanent interest to this Russian breed. Primarily, Romanovs have outstanding reproduction qualities: early sexual maturity, out-of-season breeding ability, and extraordinary prolificacy. Using Romanov ewes in crossbreeding programs is a profitable, practical method to increase the number of highly viable hybrids. In addition, the Romanov breed has unique wool properties, which are very suitable for manufacturing felt products, rugs, and mats. However, detailed genetic information on the breed is lacking. Therefore, we performed the whole-genome SNP analysis of the original Romanov sheep to study its genetic diversity and genetic relationships with other Russian breeds. We genotyped 42 samples of Romanovs using the OvineSNP50K BeadChip and pooled the data with the set from 24 Russian breeds. Quality filtering was performed in PLINK version 1.07. Calculations were done in PLINK version 1.07, GENETIX version 4.05, and HP-Rare 1.1. We found a lower level of genetic diversity in Romanovs (Ho = 0.350 and Ar = 1.862) in comparison with other coarse wool breeds (Ho = 0.377 and Ar = 1.899). At the same time, Romanovs, compared with the 24 breeds, were characterized by the most insignificant deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (Fis = −0.005). In other breeds, Fis values varied from −0.028 to −0.082. Pairwise Fst values ranged from 0.084 to 0.124 between Romanovs and Kuibyshev and Kuchugur, respectively. The MDS analysis revealed the genetic uniqueness of Romanov sheep. Principal component (PC) 1 divided all breeds into 2 groups according the wool type (fine wool + semifine wool and coarse wool) with 4.7% of total genetic variance. By PC1 the Romanov formed an incorporated bunch and logically clustered with coarse-wool breeds. However, the Romanov was clearly separated from the others by PC2, which explained 3.8% of additional genetic variability. Most likely, a high level of consolidation and genetic differentiation of the Romanov breed from other Russian sheep are explained by its “pure gene” origin and was not improved by any breed. Our study is the first attempt to reveal the outstanding genetic nature of original Romanov sheep on whole-genome level. We will extend our study by genotyping more samples with medium-density DNA chip and using NGS technology. The research was performed under financial support of Russian Scientific Foundation (number 14-36-00039).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockFrench-language works237,207