Association of Arterial Stiffness and Central Pressure With Cognitive Function in Incident Hemodialysis Patients: The PACE Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Cognitive impairment commonly occurs in hemodialysis patients, with vascular disease potentially implicated in its pathogenesis. However, the relationship of detailed vascular assessment with cognitive function in patients new to hemodialysis has not been demonstrated. Methods In a prospective study of incident hemodialysis participants enrolled in the Predictors of Arrhythmic and Cardiovascular Risk in ESRD (PACE) study, we determined aortic stiffness by pulse-wave velocity (PWV), systemic arterial stiffness by the augmentation index (AIx) and central pulse pressure (cPP), and examined their associations with cognitive processing speed, executive function, and global cognitive impairment measured by the Trail making test A (TMTA), Trail making test B (TMTB), and the modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS). Results Mean baseline age was 55 ± 13 years, 58% were male, 72% were African American, 35% had coronary artery disease, 55% had diabetes, and 10% had cognitive impairment. At baseline, higher PWV and cPP were associated with a longer TMTA, and a higher PWV was associated with a longer TMTB, but the associations were attenuated after multivariable adjustment. At 1 year, PWV was not independently associated with TMTA, TMTB, or 3MS. However, unadjusted and adjusted analyses revealed every 10% increase in AIx and 10 mm Hg increase in cPP were associated with longer TMTB (time difference AIx : 0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02−0.25 log-seconds; time difference cPP : 0.11; 95% CI: 0.05−0.17 log-seconds) and global cognitive impairment (odds ratio [OR] AIx : 10.23; 95% CI: 1.77−59.00; OR cPP : 2.88; 95% CI: 1.48−5.59). Discussion Higher AIx and cPP, which are indicative of abnormal wave reflections in distal vessels, are associated with, and might contribute to, declining cognitive function in patients starting hemodialysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".