MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2742931730 · doi:10.1109/icvr.2017.8007513

Sliding mode control of an exoskeleton robot based on time delay estimation

2017· article· en· W2742931730 on OpenAlexaff
Brahim Brahmi, Maarouf Saad, Cristóbal Ochoa-Luna, Philippe S. Archambault, Mohammad Habibur Rahman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Canadian institutionsCentre for Interdisciplinary Research in RehabilitationÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ExoskeletonController (irrigation)Sliding mode controlNonlinear systemComputer scienceLyapunov functionRobotStability (learning theory)Lyapunov stabilityMode (computer interface)Control engineeringEngineeringControl (management)SimulationArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an adaptive control based on robust nonlinear sliding mode and time delay estimation. This controller allows a seven degrees-of-freedom arm exoskeleton robot dealing with unknown nonlinear uncertain dynamics and external disturbances. The controller is developed in order to provide passive rehabilitation. The closed loop stability of the overall system is proved based on Lyapunov theory. The proposed controller is evaluated with healthy subjects. Experiments results show the efficiency and feasibility of the controller.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProsthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsFrench-language works237,207