MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on Mechanism of Flattening Papers in Heat and Pressure method

2000· article· en· W2742938504 on OpenAlexaff
Akira Mochizuki, Gorou Satou, Yutaka Nagasawa

Bibliographic record

VenueThe proceedings of the JSME annual meeting · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlatteningMechanism (biology)MechanicsMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringGeometryPhysicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient mechanism which consists of a heat roller and a pressure roller for flattening crumpled paper was developed. Mechanical properties of papers with some crumples or folds were measured experimentally, and the paper was heated by a hot wind under tension. Folds in the paper were optically observed. And it was found that applying heat make the paper stronger. Furthermore it was found that there makes another folds in the paper unless stretching the paper in an orthogonal. direction to paper feeding direction. Mechanical model for flattening crumpled paper was proposed. The numerical result was good agreement with experimental result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe proceedings of the JSME annual meetingSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207