VERTICAL CLIMBING LOCOMOTION OF A NEW GECKO ROBOT USING DRY ADHESIVE MATERIAL
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most of Geckos can move freely on a smooth vertical surface. The wonderful ability of locomotion depended on the countless setae under the geckos' foot which have an effect on van der Waals' force between foot and surface. This kind of force belongs to the dry adhesive force. Many scientists had attempted to understand structure-function and had produced several kinds of dry adhesive material. One of the dry adhesive materials with mushroom-shaped adhesive microstructure (MSAMS) had been selected and firstly applied in vertical locomotion of Gecko robot_6 which was a bioinspired gecko robot with four legs. To apply MSAMS in Gecko robot_6 successfully, the adhesive ability of MSAMS was tested including normal force, tangential force, and the peel-off force curve with different thickness substrates of bio-inspired gecko foot. The new bio-inspired gecko foot with MSAMS was designed, and the Gecko robot_6 can climb on a smooth vertical surface (glass) stably using dry adhesive material with MSAMS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".