MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743165487 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.072

072 Insect larvae fed mycotoxin-contaminated wheat – A possible safe, sustainable protein source for animal feed?

2017· article· en· W2743165487 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMycotoxinBiologyMealwormFusariumLivestockAnimal feedPopulationFood scienceLarvaToxicologyBiotechnologyAgronomyAnimal scienceBotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Demand for increased food production, particularly protein, is increasing with the world's growing population. Alternative and sustainable sources of animal protein will be required to reduce environmental impacts of conventional livestock production. Historically, insects have been typical dietary components within eastern countries, and their nutritional value is proportionally comparable to that of conventional meat. The yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) is an edible insect, rich in CP and crude fat. Moreover, there is evidence that mealworms are able to use mycotoxin-contaminated wheat as a food source without accumulating the mycotoxins, thus providing a value for low-grade wheat along with a more sustainable and cheaper source of CP for animal feed. The aim of this study was to measure production traits and survivability and to determine whether mealworms can detoxify mycotoxins (specifically deoxynivalenol [DON]) when fed Fusarium-damaged, high-mycotoxin wheat. To achieve these objectives, naturally contaminated grain was sorted to obtain 4 levels of DON: control (0.2 ppm), low (2 ppm), medium (10 ppm), and high (12 ppm). These levels were fed to larvae (seventh to ninth instar) per replicate for feeding (n = 300) and breeding (n = 200) trials. Each treatment was replicated 5 times and the endpoint for both experiments was when 2 pupae where observed (mean = 32.8 ± 3.2 d). Larvae were fasted for 24 h and frozen prior to mycotoxin analysis by HPLC/mass spectrometry. Fusarium graminearum was culture isolated from highly chalky damaged kernels. Survival rate tended to be higher in the high diet treatment than the other treatments (P = 0.0534) when using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS. Mean ADG was estimated as 604.9542 mg/d per replicate (300 larvae), and there was no significant difference between treatments (P = 0.1489). Nevertheless, the feed conversion ratio was significantly higher for the low mycotoxin diet (mean = 84.6141, P = 0.0001) when compared with other treatments. Conversely, DON was measurable within the mealworms across all replicates with a mean of 0.1291 ppm and a range of 0.0977 to 0.1902 ppm with 6.3, 1.2, and 1.1% of ingested DON detected in dry bodies from low, medium, and high mycotoxin diets, respectively. Notably, DON concentrations were not significantly different between diets (P = 0.8828) and are far below the regulatory limits for food or feed. From our research, Tenebrio molitor does not appear to accumulate harmful mycotoxins when fed highly contaminated grain and, with further research, could conceivably be used as a sustainable, safe protein source in animal feed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.494
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it