MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743199370 · doi:10.1109/iemdc.2017.8002294

Converter-based PMSG emulator: A testbed for renewable energy experiments

2017· article· en· W2743199370 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammmadhossein Ashourianjozdani, Luiz A. C. Lopes, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTestbedPermanent magnet synchronous generatorComputer scienceGenerator (circuit theory)TransformerEmulationElectrical impedanceAmplifierElectronic engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringPower (physics)Bandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a converter-based permanent magnet synchronous generator emulator as a testbed for designing, analyzing, and testing of the generator drive and its control system as an actual device under test. The permanent magnet synchronous generator model is formulated in a real-time digital simulator. A voltage type ideal transformer model combined with a virtual impedance is presented as an interface algorithm. The design procedure and implementation of the virtual impedance in a simulation platform is discussed. A 6-switch converter as a power amplifier is used to mimic the behavior of the generator at the point of common coupling with an actual device under test. The accuracy and stability of the proposed emulator are investigated over a demanding frequency range. Technical challenges of the electrical generator emulator are considered, and proper solutions are suggested. Finally, the emulation is tested and verified through linear and nonlinear loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207