Acclimation to prolonged hypoxia alters hemoglobin isoform expression and increases hemoglobin oxygen affinity and aerobic performance in a marine fish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hemoglobin (Hb) multiplicity is common in fish, yet despite its ubiquitous nature, the functional significance is unclear. Here we explore the hypothesis that Hb multiplicity plays a role in hypoxia tolerance using the red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). Red drum is an economically and ecologically important species native to coastal regions and estuaries of the Gulf of Mexico – habitats that routinely experience pronounced hypoxic events. Using a transcriptomic approach, we demonstrate that red drum red blood cells express 7 and 5 Hbα and Hbβ isoforms, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis grouped these isoforms into distinct isoHb clades, and provided evidence of lineage specific expression of particular isoHbs. In normoxia, three isoHbs predominated (Hbα-3.1, -3.2, and Hbβ-3.1). A three-week hypoxia acclimation (48 mmHg) resulted in significant up-regulation of Hbα-2, Hbα-3.2, and Hbβ-3.1, effectively switching the predominantly expressed isoforms. Changes in subunit expression were correlated with a decrease in non-stripped hemolysate P50. Similarly, hypoxia acclimation resulted in a 20% reduction in whole animal critical oxygen threshold (Pcrit). Hypoxia acclimation was not associated with changes in gill morphology, hematocrit, or relative ventricular mass. Overall, these data provide support for the hypothesis that Hb isoform switching can provide a physiological benefit to counteract environmental stress in fishes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".