Optically saturated and unsaturated collective resonances of flat metallic nanoantenna arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study collective optical properties of arrays of flat gold nanoantennas, demonstrating they can support optically saturated and unsaturated plasmonic lattice modes when the incident light is polarized along their short axes. The saturated mode is nearly immune to the variation of the refractive index of the environment, while the unsaturated mode undergoes a large red shift without degradation as the refractive index increases. Our results show that when the incident light becomes polarized along the long axes of the nanoantennas, an increase of the refractive index of the superstrate leads to the formation of secondary plasmon peaks. These peaks are spectrally narrow and can detect variations of the ambient refractive index with a sensitivity of up to 620 nm/RIU (refractive index unit). The results suggest that the periodic arrays of flat metallic nanostructures can support hybridization of their multipolar plasmonic resonances with diffraction orders with distinct similarities and differences compared to those seen in cases of arrays of metallic nanorods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".