MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2743596934 · doi:10.2527/asasann.2017.173

173 SNP discovery for QTL associated with grazing distribution in Angus cattle using RNA-Seq

2017· article· en· W2743596934 on OpenAlexaff
Courtney F. Pierce, Derek W. Bailey, Juan F. Medrano, Ángela Cánovas, Scott E Speidel, S.J. Coleman, R. M. Enns, M. G. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrazingBiologyBeef cattleSNPQuantitative trait locusGeneticsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotypeGeneAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grazing distribution is important for pasture management in beef cattle production systems. In mountainous terrain, abiotic factors such as steep slope and high elevation often yield concentrated grazing near riparian areas and limited livestock use in uplands. While management practices (fencing, water development, and herding) are effective in improving grazing distribution, these practices are costly and labor intensive. Previous research suggests that the traits used in indices to quantify grazing distribution are moderately heritable; therefore, genomic selection could be used to improve grazing distribution. Five QTL and underlying candidate genes (ACN9, FAM48A, GRM5, MAML3, and RUSC2) have been determined to be associated with grazing distribution traits in cattle. The objective of this study was to further examine these candidate genes and identify SNP that may then be incorporated into a previously developed 50-SNP panel used for genotype associations with grazing distribution phenotypes. Sequencing of RNA (RNA-Seq) yielded 30 million reads (single-read) per sample from 6 tissues (aorta, LM muscle, lung, pulmonary artery, and right and left ventricle) collected as part of an altitude tolerance study of Angus cattle. These tissues were from 10 steers with outlying pulmonary arterial pressure observations and unique sires. Sequences were assembled to the annotated bovine reference genome (UMD3.1; release annotation 87) and analyzed using CLC Genomics Workbench (version 8.0). Variant detection was performed using two methods: (1) individual samples and (2) a pool of all samples. No variants were detected in GRM5, MAML3, and RUSC2; however, individual sample analysis identified 30 SNP within ACN9 and FAM48A, and pooled sample analysis identified 184 SNP within ACN9 and FAM48A. Twenty-one SNP were identified in both approaches. The Ensemble Variant Effect Predictor was used to determine the functional consequence of each SNP. Of the 21 SNP, 16 were intronic, four were exonic, and one was reported to be a downstream variant and a splice acceptor variant. The SNP discovered using RNA-Seq technology were compared to the exonic SNP in dbSNP within the 5 candidate genes. There were 1,663 exonic SNP in dbSNP in these genes. One synonymous SNP, located within ACN9 (rs382949979), was observed in both data from RNA-Seq and dbSNP. In summary, 21 SNP were discovered in two of the five candidate genes underlying QTL associated with grazing distribution. These SNP will be incorporated in a new genotyping panel to examine associations with the grazing distribution phenotypes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals→French-language works237,207→