MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743606799 · doi:10.5014/ajot.2017.71s1-po2052

Grounded Theory Focus Group Findings in Combat Veterans With Driving Performance Issues

2017· article· en· W2743606799 on OpenAlexaff
Sherrilene Classen, Sandra Winter, Emily Szafranski, Cassie McGowan, Charles E. Levy, Miriam Monahan, Abraham Yarney

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrounded theoryPsychologyCrashPsychological interventionFocus groupPerceptionPopulationFace (sociological concept)Applied psychologyGerontologyMedicinePsychiatryQualitative researchSociologyComputer scienceNeuroscienceEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Date Presented 3/30/2017 Combat veterans (CVs) face an increased risk of motor vehicle crash and report driving difficulty that impacts community reintegration. Grounded theory methods were used to examine CVs’ driving perception and behaviors. Clinicians working with this population can use findings to tailor interventions. Primary Author and Speaker: Sherrilene Classen Additional Authors and Speakers: Sandra Winter Contributing Authors: Cassie McGowan, Charles Levy, Miriam Monahan, Abraham Yarney

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Occupational TherapySame topicTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207