MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743681926 · doi:10.1177/0003319703054001s02

Chronic Venous Insufficiency: The Genetic Influence

2003· review· en· W2743681926 on OpenAlexaff
Marc‐Antoine Pistorius

Bibliographic record

VenueAngiology · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Canadian institutionsHotel Dieu Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeredityPhenocopyVaricose veinsDiseaseMedicineGeneticsFamily historyPhenotypePathologySurgeryGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many contributing factors are involved in the genesis of varicose disease of the lower limbs such as age, sex, heredity, sedentary life style among others. For physicians the decisive role played by heredity leaves no doubt. Few studies have, however, attempted to prove the importance of the hereditary factor on a clinical level, and no study has been conducted in molecular genetics. The impact of the hereditary factor is variably estimated and its nature is open to discussion. Despite the numerous limits of the research focusing on the hereditary aspect of varicose disease, the authors can nevertheless claim that the genetic factor definitively exists and has a great impact. There are few studies conducted among twins. The data collected in these studies point to the reality of various types of heredity. With the predominant impact of the hereditary factor, and despite the role played by environmental factors, it can be supposed that a single genetic anomaly may be the determining factor of the disease in a given family. Thus we have conducted an original study in order to identify one or several mutations predisposing to varicose disease, based on the approach called "reverse genetic" and linkage study. The study of a first family whose varicose disease segregates in an autosomal dominant manner allowed us to identify 3 potential loci, if we accept the hypothesis of 2 or 3 phenocopies. No candidate gene has been singled out in these regions in the first analysis. The study of a second family whose phenotype of the varicose disease is particularly homogeneous and segregates in an autosomal dominant manner did not confirm any of the previously identified loci, probably related to a genetic heterogeneity of the varicose disease. As a consequence, the second part of this study was devoted to determining the complete genotype of each individual within this family, in order to identify new loci of interest. A potential locus has just been identified. The third part of this research, currently being pursued, is devoted to the sequencing of potential genes. In parallel, the analysis of new large families is underway. The presentation will include an update on the hereditary and genetic aspects of varicose disease, and secondly identify the limits and difficulties of the genetic study of the families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.916

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAngiologySame topicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesFrench-language works237,207