MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743707033 · doi:10.1061/9780784480885.013

Collection and Compilation of Water Pipeline Field Performance Data

2017· article· en· W2743707033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2017 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePipeline (software)Field (mathematics)DatabaseProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this project is to collect, compile and analyze high quality field data on pipeline reliability performance for water pipelines of different materials. This project will be completed in two phases: Phase I will include the data collection from the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and their 17 Western States, as well as the U.S., Canadian, and Australian Water Utilities for different materials including cast iron, ductile iron, reinforced concrete, steel, pre-stressed concrete, PVC, AC, and others. Canadian and Australian utilities’ data and knowledge will be stored as a subset of the national pipeline database. Phase I will also include the development of a Web-based, GIS-enabled water pipelines database to aggregate and standardize the collected data, and further to identify the missing data deemed critical to understanding water pipeline performance. These tasks will be geared to meet the Phase II objectives of collecting and/or generating the missing data, and the establishment of an understanding of the general state of buried water pipeline infrastructure, failure rates, general effectiveness of corrosion control measures, and the calculation of failure rates for each water pipeline material. Virginia Tech will protect data and database as per federal requirements under export-import control law. The proposed research has the following five objectives: Developing a standardized data and metadata structure for verifying, storing, updating, retrieving, and exporting/importing water pipeline infrastructure attributes; Creating a GIS-driven Web-based platform for developing, analyzing, validating, implementing, and benchmarking of models and tools for pipeline asset management; Piloting of PIPEiD with utilities of various sizes across the U.S. for demonstration; Establishing a protocol for water pipeline data security, sanitization, and publication; and Developing a plan to promote and sustain effort by engaging the water industry. This paper presents the national effort for water pipeline data collection and compilation methodologies. This project will determine the state of the knowledge in water utilities, other industries, and large Internet of Things (IoT) firms to lay the groundwork to identify key issues that can be addressed by data collection and big data analytics for water pipeline infrastructure systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score0.202

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it