MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743707033 · doi:10.1061/9780784480885.013

Collection and Compilation of Water Pipeline Field Performance Data

2017· article· en· W2743707033 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sunil K. Sinha, Lee Sears

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2017 · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePipeline (software)Field (mathematics)DatabaseProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this project is to collect, compile and analyze high quality field data on pipeline reliability performance for water pipelines of different materials. This project will be completed in two phases: Phase I will include the data collection from the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and their 17 Western States, as well as the U.S., Canadian, and Australian Water Utilities for different materials including cast iron, ductile iron, reinforced concrete, steel, pre-stressed concrete, PVC, AC, and others. Canadian and Australian utilities’ data and knowledge will be stored as a subset of the national pipeline database. Phase I will also include the development of a Web-based, GIS-enabled water pipelines database to aggregate and standardize the collected data, and further to identify the missing data deemed critical to understanding water pipeline performance. These tasks will be geared to meet the Phase II objectives of collecting and/or generating the missing data, and the establishment of an understanding of the general state of buried water pipeline infrastructure, failure rates, general effectiveness of corrosion control measures, and the calculation of failure rates for each water pipeline material. Virginia Tech will protect data and database as per federal requirements under export-import control law. The proposed research has the following five objectives: Developing a standardized data and metadata structure for verifying, storing, updating, retrieving, and exporting/importing water pipeline infrastructure attributes; Creating a GIS-driven Web-based platform for developing, analyzing, validating, implementing, and benchmarking of models and tools for pipeline asset management; Piloting of PIPEiD with utilities of various sizes across the U.S. for demonstration; Establishing a protocol for water pipeline data security, sanitization, and publication; and Developing a plan to promote and sustain effort by engaging the water industry. This paper presents the national effort for water pipeline data collection and compilation methodologies. This project will determine the state of the knowledge in water utilities, other industries, and large Internet of Things (IoT) firms to lay the groundwork to identify key issues that can be addressed by data collection and big data analytics for water pipeline infrastructure systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePipelines 2017Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207