Design Guidelines for Symmetrical Single-Lane Roundabouts Based on Intersection Sight Distance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Checking roundabout sight distance is currently performed graphically. This paper develops analytical models for lateral clearance at symmetrical single-lane roundabouts based on intersection sight distance (ISD) and establishes related geometric design guidelines. The models are developed for two cases: an approach vehicle ahead of the yield line and before the crosswalk (Case 1), and a stationary vehicle at the yield line (Case 2). Sight distances to the respective conflicting-circulating and entering vehicles are analyzed. The maximum lateral clearance is formulated for each case using mathematical optimization. The results show that both cases of the approach and stationary vehicles are critical and therefore should be included in the ISD analysis at roundabouts. Using the developed models, design guidelines are established for the radius of the central island, entry-curve lateral clearance, exit crosswalk location, and driver’s field of peripheral vision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it