MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2743821210 · doi:10.1101/173146

chewBBACA: A complete suite for gene-by-gene schema creation and strain identification

2017· preprint· en· W2743821210 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mickael Silva, Miguel P. Machado, Diogo Nuno Silva, Mirko Rossi, Jacob Moran‐Gilad, Sérgio M. Santos, Mário Ramirez, João André Carriço

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceSuiteGenomeFile formatSoftware suiteSoftwareDirectorySource codeComputational biologyDatabaseGeneBiologyGeneticsProgramming languageOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Gene-by-gene approaches are becoming increasingly popular in bacterial genomic epidemiology and outbreak detection. However, there is a lack of open-source scalable software for schema definition and allele calling for these methodologies. The chewBBACA suite was designed to assist users in the creation and evaluation of novel whole-genome or core-genome gene-by-gene typing schemas and subsequent allele calling in bacterial strains of interest. The software can run in a laptop or in high performance clusters making it useful for both small laboratories and large reference centers. ChewBBACA is available at https://github.com/B-UMMI/chewBBACA or as a docker image at https://hub.docker.com/r/ummidock/chewbbaca/ . DATA SUMMARY Assembled genomes used for the tutorial were downloaded from NCBI in August 2016 by selecting those submitted as Streptococcus agalactiae taxon or sub-taxa. All the assemblies have been deposited as a zip file in FigShare ( https://figshare.com/s/9cbe1d422805db54cd52 ), where a file with the original ftp link for each NCBI directory is also available. Code for the chewBBACA suite is available at https://github.com/B-UMMI/chewBBACA while the tutorial example is found at https://github.com/B-UMMI/chewBBACA_tutorial . I/We confirm all supporting data, code and protocols have been provided within the article or through supplementary data files. ⊠ IMPACT STATEMENT The chewBBACA software offers a computational solution for the creation, evaluation and use of whole genome (wg) and core genome (cg) multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemas. It allows researchers to develop wg/cgMLST schemes for any bacterial species from a set of genomes of interest. The alleles identified by chewBBACA correspond to potential coding sequences, possibly offering insights into the correspondence between the genetic variability identified and phenotypic variability. The software performs allele calling in a matter of seconds to minutes per strain in a laptop but is easily scalable for the analysis of large datasets of hundreds of thousands of strains using multiprocessing options. The chewBBACA software thus provides an efficient and freely available open source solution for gene-by-gene methods. Moreover, the ability to perform these tasks locally is desirable when the submission of raw data to a central repository or web services is hindered by data protection policies or ethical or legal concerns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207